Legal

Wealth.com's Ester extracts beneficiaries, distributions and provisions from estate documents, linking findings to the original PDF for advisor review. Its customer-authored vendor post reports average analysis below two minutes. Building the system required annotated documents and legal expertise.

Harvey offers Claude within Assistant, Vault and Workflows for contract analysis, due diligence and drafting. Lawyers can revise intermediate outputs before approval. Harvey reports deployment in under a month and strong internal benchmark performance, but no quantified client time saving in this case.

Law&Company uses Claude with retrieval of legal sources in SuperLawyer for research, precedent analysis, drafting and document questions. In a user survey, 92.5% reported saving time. These are self-reported results rather than independently measured lawyer productivity.

A Utah court filing contained a nonexistent case generated through ChatGPT. According to the court account reported by heise, the responsible lawyer had not checked the draft. The court ordered cost reimbursement and a $1,000 payment. This is a documented failure case.

Project Themis uses Gemini prompts to identify inconsistencies, structure arguments and prepare document drafts. The practitioner publishes prompts and a repository, with human review in the workflow. The article provides no validated legal-accuracy or savings study.

Deutsche Telekom and Gleiss Lutz helped develop Harvey Shared Spaces for joint regulatory and transactional work. The vendor describes shared matter context, document analysis and drafting. The feature was in early access at publication; customer-specific time savings were not quantified.