Legal drafting with an unchecked fabricated citation

DraftLegal servicesUnited States

A Utah court filing contained a nonexistent case generated through ChatGPT. According to the court account reported by heise, the responsible lawyer had not checked the draft. The court ordered cost reimbursement and a $1,000 payment. This is a documented failure case.

Draft: this entry has not yet been human-reviewed. Its summary and extracted facts are AI-assisted. Check the original source before relying on the claims.

For whom

Legal professionals in firms of any size studying drafting risks; legal research expertise.

Not for

Unsuitable for submitting citations without checking the underlying primary legal sources.

Brain Score

5/10 brain cells
Impact
0/2
Evidence
1/2
Reproducibility
1/2
Maturity
2/2
Reach
1/2

Five values from 0 to 2. The total has a minimum of 1. A reading aid based on the source, not an independently measured performance result. How the score works

Original source

ChatGPT statt Recherche: Gericht sanktioniert Anwalt 
Type
News
Published
Data as of
2026-10-31

The data date records when this dataset was included in the collection. It is separate from the publication date of the source.

Tools

All use cases