Extract utility usage from receipts for carbon accounting

DraftCarbon accountingJapan

ASUENE compared Gemini and GPT-4o models on 200 sample utility receipts, extracting transaction months, consumption and costs. Its tests found Gemini more than four seconds faster on average. The article includes sample documents, outputs and benchmark charts; deployment of the tested models is not established.

Draft: this entry has not yet been human-reviewed. Its summary and extracted facts are AI-assisted. Check the original source before relying on the claims.

For whom

Carbon-accounting and document-processing teams at startups or larger firms; OCR evaluation skills.

Not for

The benchmark is unsuitable as proof of accuracy on unrelated document collections.

Brain Score

6/10 brain cells
Impact
2/2
Evidence
2/2
Reproducibility
1/2
Maturity
0/2
Reach
1/2

Five values from 0 to 2. The total has a minimum of 1. A reading aid based on the source, not an independently measured performance result. How the score works

Original source

ChatGPT-4oとGemini-2.0 Flashによる領収書のOCR性能評価 
Type
Blog
Published
Data as of
2026-10-31

The data date records when this dataset was included in the collection. It is separate from the publication date of the source.

Tools

All use cases